As I read the book The Ancestor Syndrome (Ed. Di Renzo) of Schuetzenberger, I began to reflect on the importance of having a name. All items that we know have a name and when you make a discovery, invention, I think one of the first things that comes to mind, is to find a name. Put all the letters and name is considered to have magical power, the power to make things exist, to create, to make them real. To whom can I have in clinical practice patients who did not want to appoint a feeling, because that would make him real and we would have had to face?
Who has not ever feel a sense of discomfort when they are not the words (Or word!) To describe a feeling, a feeling? Then I came back to mind while studying for an exam, turn in the text was written that there are many more concepts, what we are actually able to give a name. On second thought is just that, but luckily there are other languages \u200b\u200bthat come to help.
Ah! what a wonderful feeling I felt when I heard of the term dialect annigghio. How well this term describes the tightness that you feel when you feel surrounded by so many stimuli / things and you do not find their way. How nice it feels to say that Rangers: without a precise destination. The lack of terms of a language can be compensated dalle altre lingue. Come avviene con i termini inglesi solitude e lonelyness.
Nel testo della Schuetzenberger si parla di come il nome di battesimo sia fondante dell’identità dell’individuo. Il cognome non si può scegliere, ma il nome si. Può riflettere una tradizione familiare, una scelta religiosa, dovuta alla moda, o il tentativo di aprire i confini e rompere con la tradizione. Si può decidere un nome che piaccia e basta o di un parente deceduto. Talvolta il nome di una persone è indicativo della sua provenienza, delle sue origini. Per esempio i nomi religiosi sono più diffusi nel sud Italia.
Il solo nome di battesimo ci dà già delle informazioni sulla nostra famiglia o su chi lo sceglie. The name is the first inheritance we receive. The first word of our family history. The name is one of the bases of identity, reminding us of Schuetzenberger. Ask a person why it is called, becomes an excellent starting point for biographical of his family. The reconstruction of identity both in terms of pedigree, both psychological and complicated, but in his book is the explanation of how it worked at the patient a genosociogramma. Perhaps psychologists avran've heard and used the genogram.
For non-professionals, the genogram is done starting from the patient's name and put it around the names of people and animals significant for the patient, with arrows indicating the type of relationship between the patient and others and by inserting the key dates in his life. The graphic design alone can already give indications about the type of personality of the person. The
genosociogramma beyond. It 'a real family tree (which you can also add people extrafamiliari important for the patient), where significant events are recorded and all the dates they occurred. By doing so the author has found that family secrets and / or unspoken, illness, accidents and various disasters, not only were found in the patient's life, but who were also present in the lives of suoi antenati.
Ciò che i suoi predecessori non avevano risolto nelle loro vite, veniva come lasciato in eredità ai posteri, che si trovavano così ad affrontare i loro traumi irrisolti. La Schuetzenberger comincia il suo libro descrivendo i presupposti teorici alla base del genosociogramma e delle sue scoperte, e accompagna per mano il lettore attraverso Sindromi da anniversario, Doppie sindromi da anniversario, Venti di proiettili, Incesti genealogici. Man mano che si procede, si passa da un testo didattico a un romanzo avvincente, che rende veloce la lettura. Rimane un grande quesito irrisolto. Come avviene questa trasmissione tra le generazioni?
C. G. Jung riteneva che esistesse una eredità psychic. And if so? And if in addition to genetic inheritance, there was also a past heritage psychic?
Looking ahead to this hypothesis, the first impression is that it leaves the "facts" scientific, but actually may not be far-fetched. Then I think of the name we gave our son Ross. Two years before the birth I dreamed that I was pregnant, which was male and that his name was Ross. Who knows how to interpret the Schuetzenberger that Ross is so called because of a premonitory dream?
Dr. Luigina Fist
Di Renzo Editore 
0 comments:
Post a Comment